Monday, January 30, 2012

What are we becoming?


Nicole Eldridge
Eric Leake
Extended Essay #1
What Are We Becoming?
This is essay is for the youngest, Western generation of today, who has never gotten the opportunity to live in a society where technology did not transcend onto virtually every aspect of their routine, daily life. Reading and writing can now all be done through a computer, whereas my generation still had the chance to live in a society in which technology was still developing and had not fully taken over such aspects of daily life. Essentially, my generation was one of the last to have something to compare this age of revolutionary, instant technology because we formed part of the transition from the old age of technology to the new age of technology. If our younger generations are not taught the difference, this could potentially harm our society and its ability for intellectual thinking. As long as they become informed, society can move forward, using this incredible amount of technology to their advantage.       

I fondly remember the days when I would anxiously await the Sunday newspaper, so I could read the cartoons and try to practice an elevated level of reading by trying to read through the fascinating news articles. At this time, I was about seven years old; reading the newspaper was a simple pleasure for a little girl like me, who wanted to imitate her father. After I was done reading, I would skim the sections of the newspaper and I would end up trying to figure out movie schedules at different theaters. While I looked for movie times, my father was figuring out the end results for different sports games. Whether it was college ball or professional level, my father enjoyed reading the sports articles and statistics. Later on, I enjoyed getting on the computer to try and play a poorly made computer game called “Minesweeper”. If I had any homework and wanted to look up information online, I would have to use the dial up chord, and it would take what seemed to be an eternity’s worth of time listening to strange, extraterrestrial-like noises come out of the bulky computer.  Instead, I would go to the library and check out a million books to gather my research from. The process would take a while because I had to filter out lots of information, but in the end I would come up with a fabulous amount of information and sources. During my free time, besides playing with Barbie dolls, Pokémon cards, and my yellow Gameboy Color, I loved reading books; this was also to attain lots of AR (accelerated reading) points at my school and keep my top score in the classroom. As I write this description of my childhood habits, I am shockingly surprised by how different contemporary society is. If one thinks about it, it has not even been a decade since technology dramatically changed.
Now, you as a younger generation might be a bit confused that only 10 years back people led the lifestyle that I describe to you in the paragraph above. Let me guess, you have never read the newspaper? To you, the newspaper is just that rolled up wad of grey papers sitting in your recycling been…untouched. You did not even know there were cartoon comics in one of the sections. On the real, you probably do not read cartoons anyways…unless you are some sort of a geek. In all honesty, who even checks the newspaper for movie theater schedules or sports statistics? That is such a “grandpa” habit. Just Google your inquiry and the information is instantly available, this way you do not even have to wait for the “newspaper boy” to come and do his rounds. Maybe you thought, “what the heck is Minesweeper, there thousands of other online games, and plus I have a Wii or an Xbox; I do not really need computer games.” These days, you have probably never been exposed to dial-up Internet; how strange and awful does it sound to have to call an Internet service via computer and listen to alien-like sounds until your Internet is connected. Plus, dial-up Internet is about 15 times slower than you would be used to (I am not going to lie, dial-up internet would be living torture for you high speed internet pros). Not to mention, the computer would not have been a sleek, flat screen, but a bulky machine. Also, unless your teacher makes you go to check out a book in the library, or you are one of those kids who is a bookworm, you probably never stop by the library for fun. Certainly, you never stop by the library to do research when Google and Wikipedia are all you need. And I am positive that you get your research done extremely quickly, because you type a lot faster than I did at your age. Consider your generation a fortunate bunch; you have all of the perks in the world and life is made easier and more efficient.  But do not let that make you become too lazy to independently function, especially when it comes to your reading and writing habits.  Young generations, even mine, are being looked down upon for their reliance on the Internet and technology. Honestly, this age has its positive and negative consequences on reading and writing habits, and I believe that as long as they are addressed, society can continue to use technology to their advantage without letting it supplement human intelligence and capacity.
            According to Andrew Sullivan, online writing has brought society many beneficial advantages to the writing world. Blogging is an extremely popular form of online writing, one that Sullivan strongly advocates. Before, if one wanted to instantly write their thoughts on a subject, pen, paper, and a limited to non-existent audience would have to suffice. Only if one was a published author or in a journalistic profession, would a piece of writing reach a larger audience. Yet with blogging, we can publish our instant thought to a vast audience without being a journalist, one we cannot even fathom. “We blog now—as news reaches us, as facts emerge . . . it is, in many ways, writing out loud” (Sullivan 2). Indeed, this is privilege that the technology of the 21st century has granted us; to be able to express our thoughts instantly to an audience other than ourselves, makes us more proud of our work. Furthermore, the criticism given to us helps us build and better our writing skills. With all of the Facebook, Twitter, and texting controversies, younger generations must prove their abilities as writers more than ever before. Much criticism is generated towards the era of social networking and chatting, because it is said to diminish our capacity to create intellectual, grammatically correct pieces of writing. In a world where “lol” has substituted laughing and there is an abbreviation for almost anything, there is a reason to be skeptical about a young person’s writing skills. As a younger generation, one must remember the importance of maintaining an educated status when it comes to writing. Older generations wrote beautifully and eloquently written pieces of literature, and as a younger generation we must strive to keep the eloquence and art of writing alive in our own works. Because of the fact that we are quickly granted access to various sorts of literature, I believe we have the capability to preserve and continue an elevated form or writing. As Clive Thompson’s article “Clive Thompson on the New Literacy” states, “young people today write far more than any other generation before them . . . because so much socializing takes place online, and it almost always involves text . . .out of the classroom–life writing” (Thompson 1).  Thompson said that Professor Lunsford did a writing study with her students at Harvard, “When Lunsford examined the work of first-year students, she didn’t find a single example of texting speak in an academic paper” (Thompson 2). Personally, I believe this to be a crucial part of writing today. As long as younger generations do not confuse “text talk” with “school talk”, generations can continue to move forward with their writing abilities. If a person can differentiate the level of academic writing that is required depending on an audience, and has the educated capacity to do so, I believe that young writers will continue to preserve an excellent level of writing. So far, I think our generations have been doing so; I have been personally impressed by the level of writing exerted by my college peers and believe that generations to come will be able to continue along the same footsteps.
            Nonetheless, although the Internet has its benefits, it also has disadvantageous effects on our technology-crazed society. In all sincerity, all generations have their pros and cons; people always find something to criticize and compare to.  For example, Nicholas Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, states that readers have begun to struggle with lengthy texts. Carr addresses people who use the Internet and computer technology and says, “the more they use the Web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing” (Carr 2). The habit of “power reading” or skimming through text has affected our ability to read, or concentrate while reading deep, profound texts. Honestly, I completely agree, the distractions that come with technology (i.e. Facebook) truly do affect our ability to stay focused. Is there anything we can do to fix this? Well, although trying to ignore the calls of the Facebook notifications and text messages, sometimes it seems virtually impossible. Chris Hedges’ article, “America the Illiterate”, demonstrates the extremist, hateful point of view that some people have on modern day society. He states, “we have moved from a print based society to an image based society” (Hedges 3). Although I do not agree with this perspective, I understand where this point of view is coming from. When one looks at a magazine, one is immediately drawn to the images, one skims the images of news headlines, and one is drawn to the images on advertisements the list goes on. It is true; one does not take the time to fully read the rest of a text if there is an image to sum it up. Moreover, Nicholas Carr believes that the age of the Internet has become an age where “artificial intelligence” is replacing “human intelligence”. Artificial intelligence is seen as the computer, the Internet, etc. which according to Carr can replace human thinking. Never. Humans must learn to intelligently use the Internet and computer in order to be productive with the technology. Yes, societies with Internet access have definitely become lazier, but never less intelligent; the human brain is the most amazing tool that we have access to. To conclude, although technology has its plusses, young generations must be careful that these plusses do not turn into negative luxuries that harm our reading abilities.
            Truly, young generations have no going back. This is a new era, we have learned to accept it and accommodate to its lifestyle; we have become accustomed to its advantages and its efficiency. When it comes to writing, it seems that younger generations continue to practice and develop positive writing skills. Although texting and Facebook messaging are not always grammatically correct, young generations seem to be able to distinguish the difference between informal, social writing and academic, professional writing. If this cycle continues writing will continue to grow and expand. Yet, I do not believe the same goes for reading. It is extremely difficult for people to read like they used to. Concentration is being diminished and one prefers to skim texts instead of going through the trouble of reading the entire work. For many, reading has become a hassle. Young generations should strive to bring back a culture in which reading is a routine, yet enjoyable task. In my opinion, reading has become more negatively affected then writing, but I believe that YOU, the younger generations will address and can strive to change this concern more than ever and prove to the world that technology will not affect your abilities to become critical, intellectual, and advanced readers and writers. Instead, of you becoming a slave of technology and the age of the Internet, this technology should become a slave to you. 

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Blogging Reflections...


Well, I’m nine blog posts deep. So far, this is my second college class that requires me to frequently blog. In all honesty, I’ve had more fun with Blogger than Word Press, and I’ve liked the blog topics more in this class. I’ve definitely felt like this writing course has actually made me, TRULY enjoy blogging. I’m not just saying that to be a suck-up, because I loved and was passionate about the other class (Intro to Media, Culture, & Society) as well, I just didn’t enjoy the blogging as much.

For me, the most challenging part of working with these posts has been deciding the content of them I don’t put too much thought into it though, I just write. But sometimes, deciding the key, important parts of an author’s article can be troublesome, and sometimes, I tend to go overboard. But then again, that’s just me. I always have too much to say. In some situations, I should probably work on that. 600 words for a 250-word requirement might just be too much.
           
I’m actually quite surprised with how passionate I’ve become about the blog, I feel personal attachment to the blog; it’s MY blog. And not in a selfish, possessive way, more like…in a proud, accomplished way.  It’s interesting to see how one topic can have so many different answers. Each of my fellow classmates answers the prompt in their own way, sometimes…. completely different from another. But that’s what makes it theirs. I love seeing how each person adds a different element to the same topic. Additionally, I thoroughly enjoy seeing everyone’s styles of writing. It amazes me some of the ideas and thoughts my classmates come up with. Yes, I’m working with a smart, educated, opinionated, talented bunch.

In terms of web habits, I guess they haven’t changed all that much. I’m still tempted by Facebook every two seconds and I still do the same old routines. BUT, I do have a new element to my routine. News checking. Honestly, I tried doing that once in a while already. Now, it’s becoming a frequent habit, and it was definitely something I was aspiring to do anyway. Being an informed citizen of the world is important… especially at this academic level.

There is one aspect I’ve definitely noticed a change in, when it comes to my writing habits. At first, I was conservative with my opinion and was a bit skeptical about voicing it all the way in a college class. Pssshhh. That didn’t last long at all; as soon as the fire within me was ignited I became completely freed from any ties that were holding me down. Once I found a topic to be passionate about, nothing was going to stop me from saying what I thought. That’s what blogs are for after all, right?

In short, I guess one could say I didn’t ever picture “blogging” as a possibility in my life. I didn’t have anything against it, but I never thought it could be for me. I can reassure the world that this idea of blogging has changed. I enjoy it, and I’ll continue it. Go bloggingJ

Different Perspectives on Modern Day Literacy


             How refreshing. A positive outlook on literacy in modern day society has been presented. After reading Hedges and Carr’s extremist articles, I definitely needed a different perspective.

              Scribner takes an attractive approach on defining literacy. The question is actually one that sparks our curiosity. How the heck do you define literacy? It is broad and is composed of various components, it is hard to put a fence around the word and give it a set definition. Diverse definitions of the word shape our conception of what we consider a literate and a non-literate. This causes a clash. As Scribner puts it, we work to hard trying to define literacy as an “attribute of individuals” (Scribner 8) when one should actually look at is as a “social achievement” (Scribner 8). Literacy is the “outcome of cultural transmission” (Scribner 8). Scribner takes literacy and divides it into three metaphors, defining each metaphor individually; she explains how each metaphor describes a part of the definition of literacy: literacy as an adaption, literacy as a power, and literacy as a state of grace.  First, literacy as an adaption “takes into account goals and settings of people’s activities with written language (Scribner 12). It addresses the “proficiency necessary for effective performance in a range of setting and customary activities” (Scribner 10).  Next, literacy as a power is the “relation ship between group and community advancement (Scribner 12). Power with literacy describes how becoming literate can lead to social change within a society and help free a person from a victimized state. Finally, literacy as a state of grace describes how some people associate literacy with having certain special virtues; therefore, one who is literate is “cultured” or “blessed” or “holy”.  Essentially, literacy as a state of grace “leads to intellectual, aesthetic, and spiritual knowledge of the humankind available through written word” (Scribner 14).

         Moreover, while Hedges proposed a radical definition of modern-day literacy, Thompson’s article “Clive Thompson on the New Literacy”, covers the other side of the spectrum. Instead of saying that we have gone from a delusional, print based society to an image based society that doesn’t understand reality, Thompson believes that the written word is becoming more powerful than ever. According to Professor Lundsford (from Thompson’s article) technology is actually “pushing our literacy in bold new directions” (Thompson 1). Because of young people’s large variety of social networks, they actually write much more than any other generation: texting, Facebook chatting, Twitter updates, PLUS extensive academic essays, it all compiles to be a grand quantity of writing. Thompson calls this “life writing”. I’d call that…the perfect term. Before, Americans wouldn’t take the time to write unless school or job related, but now with all of technologies new networking systems, writing is everywhere. But just because writing has become more commonly used in an informal, social setting, it doesn’t mean students don’t know how to address their audience. They know exactly when to be informal and use slang and when to use their intellectual writing abilities. 

           Personally, I enjoyed Carr’s, Scribner’s, and Thompson’s texts, but I honestly extremely disagreed with Hedges. I feel that the rest of the author’s all had valid points. Carr and Thompson had opposite opinions on matters, yet both had true aspects to their writing. Scribner’s piece was more objective, with the purpose of composing a definition, not creating a bias. 

Hedges be Crazy.



Take it easy, Hedges.  As I read through Hedge’s article “America the Illiterate” I immediately went, “whoa there, this guy’s an extremist”. Chris Hedge’s portrays America’s society of today as an illiterate, uneducated, ignorant, conforming society living in a fantasy world made up of lies and illusions. WHAT?! Sorry, but I cannot agree on this one. Not for a bit. I didn’t even understand where he was coming up with half of his “facts”. He basically says that images have taken over words in our society to help out the illiterate bunch. That instead of slogans, one is manipulated by images. I’m sorry, that’s called advertising. Of course, images will be used to make things look more appealing, or for people to get a different perspective on a subject. Duh, if one sees a picture of the Bacon Cheeseburger and the Fettuccine Alfredo on a menu, they have something to supplement the written description; this might help make their decision between ordering one or the other much simpler. It’s not because we are dumb and can’t read, it just makes things more appealing. “We live in a permanent state of amnesia” (Hedges 1). Let’s be real…is this a joke? I literally could have not been more confused with this article. Hedges basically said that the literate and political tier of the population controls and manipulates the illiterates with misleading images, causing them to live a complete myth. Apparently, we believe that just because we are citizens of the United States we are some “god given”, superior creatures and for us, that’s enough.  One of his main points is that “we have moved from a print based society to an image based society”. False. Chris Hedges never takes into account what society was like before. What about in the days of Uncle Sam, Rosy the Riveter, civil rights, hippies etc.? Propaganda was FILLED with images. The images defined society just as much then as they do now, images are a glimpse a facilitator of an idea, a memory, that we can keep in our mind, one that we can closely identify with; it by no means simply just a way to cope with our new, illiterate society. Actually, this isn’t just an emerging problem . . . we’ve had illiterates in every single era of America. How about the slaves, and the Natives? They were a large portion of our country's population, and they were illiterate. How about the women and children factory workers? Illiterate. Our society will always have an uneducated class, and an educated one. It’s reality. Nowadays for example, we have predominant, lower Hispanic immigrant class of workers who are much more likely to be illiterate than a middle class family who can afford to send their child to a quality education. So no, illiteracy isn’t just a new trend. Reality check...it’s been here. No, it hasn’t left. We still haven’t been able to fully address it. But that doesn’t mean our society is a bunch of image crazed, confused, unrealistic people. Honestly, I found most of the article quite troubling, but what really set me off was one of his closing lines “the ability to think for oneself, to draw independent conclusions, to express dissent when judgment and common sense indicate something is wrong, to be self critical, to challenge authority, to understand historical facts, to separate truth from lies, to advocate for change and to acknowledge that there are other view, different ways of being, that are morally and socially acceptable, are dying.” (Hedges 3). WHAT?! What am I in college for? If this were actually the case, I think we’d all just be robots. 


These last two authors, Hedges and Carr have made me realize that there truly are people with the firm belief that society of today is becoming quite dumber.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Is Google Making us Stupid? Response Blog


Reading a title like “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, had me hooked from the get go. I started to think to myself…IS Google making me and everyone else who relies on it stupid? What makes this article much more thought provoking is the fact that it is relatable. I thought about the how recently Wikipedia decided to protest by doing a blackout…honestly, I realized how god darn much I use Wikipedia and how helpful it is when I need a quick answer, it was almost tedious to try and get my information elsewhere, when all I needed was to know who someone was or what a company did. Also, I felt like Carr was personally describing me as he said that he used to be able to ready lengthy texts, and that now that he was used to the rapidity of the internet his “concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages” (Carr 1). I just can’t do it anymore. I always need a break or find myself doing something else when I’m trying to read a long article, especially if it is academic related. I know I have to do it, but it takes quite a bit of perseverance to finish sometimes. As Carr says ,“deep reading . . . has become a struggle” (Carr 1). Carr accentuates the fact that the Internet indeed does give us unlimited access to a rich store of easily available information, and we’ve become accustomed to this. “What the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration . . . “ (Carr 1). It’s true. I wouldn’t say Google makes us stupid; we are just becoming lazier because we’ve become used to quick, accessible information and we find it tedious to do look in libraries, and long articles. Who can really blame us? But, this isn’t necessarily a good thing to become so used to. When we are faced with situations in which this commodity isn’t available we find it quite wearisome. Just like Carr says, we’ve become programmed to be used to a few clicks giving us all of the possible information possible, and we “fight to stay focused”  (Carr 2) when it comes to a tedious, time consuming situation.  Instead of deep reading, we have gotten used to skimming texts. Honestly, although this is true, I also believe that one still has the capacity and the tendency to read thoroughly. Just like anyone in search for information, whether it be from a book or a website, one skims the information to see if it is useful enough to read in depth. Carr stresses the fact that the way our modern, Western brains work has changes; they’ve been reprogrammed. Of course, technology changes we change, but the way a human thinks never changes; instead, the way we go about our tasks or how we choose to access information has changed, but this is only because we have the ability to do so. Honestly the question, is Google making us stupid is stupid itself. A search engine can’t make a human being stupid; lazy, yes we have become accustomed to certain commodities, but that doesn’t make us stupid…it makes us practical. Another one of Carr’s main ideas is that the computer is a form of artificial intelligence that is supplementing the human brain, and possible even replacing it. He insinuates that the computer thinks for us, but let’s be honest. One MUST think in in order to intelligently use the Internet and its sources for the Internet to be used correctly. The Internet or Google didn’t think up this blog, I did.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Harris, Sullivan, Reading, Writing, etc.



As I read through the text, Rewriting, I came to think that Joseph Harris’ uses the term “rewriting” in quite a thought provoking way. His “active and critical stance” (Harris 2) provides an innovative definition to the term. Harris’ defines such topic by saying that rewriting other author’s texts is  


"using their texts for your purposes . . . say something new and say it well ” (Harris 2). 

“Our creativity thus has the roots in the work of others- in response, reuse, and rewriting”. (Harris 2).

Furthermore, Harris speaks of rewriting as a social practice, his definition of such being “the use of certain tools in a well defined context to achieve a certain end or make a particular product” (Harris 3).  Rewriting provides appealing approaches to the subject and provides the reader with tips on how to correctly and more critically be able to “rewrite” another person’s work. Moreover, Harris provides an interesting definition of reading as well. In his chapter “Coming to Terms”, Harris explains how readings “do not just reveal their meaning to us, we need to make sense of them. He goes on to explain that everyone reads and interprets texts differently, which means everyone will add a different perspective to the topic; he adds that if we all interpreted texts in the same way, there would be little to argue about when rewriting or discussing a text. As a reader, Harris suggests one to “strive to be fair and self reflective” (Harris 15). In coming to terms one must “give the text its due and decide what you want to make of it” (Harris 15). According to Harris “coming to terms” consists of three moves:

[to “define project of the writer in your own terms”
“note the keywords or passages in the texts” and,
“assess the uses and limits of this approach” ] (Harris 15].

In contrast to Harris, Sullivan provides a different approach and definition of writing and reading. This is partially because they both focus on different types of writing. Sullivan talks about how blogging can be a spontaneous expression of thought, whereas writing in a formal setting requires much more filtering, proofreading, formality, etc. Both authors talk about how one responds to another author’s text. Sullivan emphasizes the relationship between the blogger and the reader, and how this relationship can be quite critical. Harris, on the other hand, focuses more on the fact that the reader interprets an author’s text and uses the information to build upon the existing ideas to come up with new ones and implement one’s own opinion.

Honestly, I think both authors bring up valid points and ideas. I will use their suggestions and knowledge to better my writing and reading skills in the future. 

Response to Internet Activity.



Well, I guess I’m not alone. Facebook has officially taken over so much of our lives. As a whole, young adults spend mindless amounts of time on Facebook. Most of the time, all we do is creep. . .literally. I’m not by any means saying that Facebook is a horrible network that is making our generation stupid. On the contrary, Facebook has many benefits. Sharing your photos, communicating with people far away, sharing your opinion, even getting informed on new trends and world happenings. Yet the truth is, most of the time we spend of Facebook, is actually quite useless. Hundreds of clicks each day are spent peeking in on the lives of others…even if they aren’t that interesting. We’ve become expert creepers. We know all the gossip. Hands down, the most prominent and widely used website was Facebook. But Facebook stalking isn’t satisfying enough, we need other websites to entertain us. Some of the most common social, entertaining websites are StumbleUpon, Twitter, Tumblr, YouTube, Skype, and Netflix. Students don’t just use one of the websites, they use almost all of them!  And I can’t exclude myself from this bunch. I’m just as hooked. Is this an efficient use of our time? Or is it mainly time wasted? At this point, it’s become so normal…it’s hard to tell. The Internet has become a huge way to entertain ourselves, whether it be from boredom or procrastination from our other tasks. But I noticed that we do use the Internet for more useful motives. The Internet has become the easiest way to do research and complete all of our homework tasks. Along with my classmates, the Internet was helpful for getting our homework done and we were able to use online tools to do so. Not only does the Internet allow us to easily finish school assignments. It allows us to communicate with professors, companies, etc. via e-mail etc. One of the common uses of the Internet that caught my eye that was different to me was checking sports stats. Considering the US is such a sports-crazed country, keeping up to date with one’s favorite sports is made simpler through the Internet. Moreover, we use the Internet to keep ourselves informed of global/ local happenings. Reading news articles helps us stay notified about the world around us.  In the end, the internet is truly used for EVERYTHING. Boredom, entertainment, eavesdropping, curiosity, accomplishing tasks, becoming informed, and communication are all made possible by the great phenomena of the Internet.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

A day in the Internet life of Nicole


Internet Log Monday Jan. 9th 2012

 9 12AM: Wake up, check Facebook 10 minutes
10 AM: Research PreClassic Age for Latin Cultures Class, Olmeca civilization
1205 PM: In psych class, check Facebook 15 mins. Get on Blackboard
1 PM: Check Twitter, compose a tweet about my new music obsession
130:Read NYTimes article on Colombian Drug Trafficker
3-5-zzzzz naptime
5-Log on to VHCentral.com to do French Web Assign Homework.
6.10-Google images on Switzerland for a French brochure, also go onto CIA World Factbook for Additional information. Facebook #ON.
705-YouTube funny Asian babies (not creepy at all), Facebok #ON
732-Check Hotmail, reply to sorority emails, job emails, etc.
810-Skype my best friend in Mexico, while Facebook stalking.
9-Do Psych Assessment on assess it
915-Check Wells Fargo Account Summary online, transfer money from Checking to Savings
945-Check flights to Puerto Vallarta for Spring Break
10-1045-Facebook stalking, YouTube music #ON.
11 PM-Reply to more Zumba instructor job emails
1115-Go on Mirreybook tumblr.
1130-Browse for new music
1145-Watch an episode of One Tree Hill on Netflix
1235-Look for cute clothes on BCBG Max Azria website, one last Facebook check, new profile pic, etc..
1 AM-zzzz computer #OFF

Response to Andrew Sullivan's "Why I Blog"


Andrew Sullivan’s arguments in favor of blogging truly made me reflect upon lots of the reason on why people do blog. As an aspiring journalist, I found it quite interesting to see a journalist’s perspective on the benefits of blogging. When Sullivan referred to blogging as the “spontaneous expression of instant thought” I thought to myself, “how cool is that?” Anytime I want to randomly reflect upon a thought, share an unexpected experience, or express an opinion, I can easily blog about. Sullivan has many reason for blogging, for him blogging is therapeutic, and also allows him to “write out loud”.  Indeed, Sullivan’s is passionate about rawness of the writing that is produced by blogging, and the fact that it is instantaneously published. When it comes to blogging, one does not have to wait for editors to approve or proofread, or deadlines to be delayed, or sources to be confirmed; in blogging, one just simply clicks a button and their writing is thrown into a massive ocean of texts, accessible to millions of people. As a professional journalist, Sullivan found it relieving that for once he didn’t have to wait on anyone to be able to publish his work. He felt that being able to publish things during the moment gave it so much more life and meaning. Additionally, he mentions how many people can comment on one’s blog, and that taking the criticism helps one grow as a blogger. After reading this article, I believe that Sullivan brings up some positive points about blogging, I’m very eager to continue bloggingJ