Woah there, slow down. Too many new concepts are being thrown
at me at once. First of all, I’d definitely say that while reading this
article, I would have to go back, and re-read what I had just read, because I
would get confused on what he was trying to say. I mean, the guy has a point.
True. But he may just be a little too “in your face” about it. Just a bit.
If you
think about it, it’s true. I guess that’s what this article caused me to do: reflect
a little further. I guess I just had never really had the need to think about
what news was. But Jarvis is right. The news isn’t just the press. The news
consists of a billion different sources, well maybe not a billion. Although at
first, I was like, what the heck is this? Then, I realized that the press
sphere is simply demonstrating all of the different sources that should be
categorized into the term, news. The press is included in the sphere that
defines news, but it is only a small portion of all of news. Observers,
government, data, etc. are all part of the press-sphere.
Although
the model of the press-sphere does a good job defining what consists of news,
it doesn’t personally relate to my experiences in relation to the news. I’m the
receiver of the news. That’s why there is also a me-sphere. For me, some of the
sources that I use to obtain are TV news broadcast, online newspaper sites,
blogs, social networks, word of mouth, etc.
I would
definitely say that I didn’t agree with everything in the article, but it did
open up an interesting perspective for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment